The High Court has dismissed the application for an injunction filed by Team Duncan in relation to the 2026 Grenada Football Association (GFA) elections.
The ruling was delivered on Saturday morning (9 May) by Honourable Madam Justice Ria Bailey following a hearing held on 8 May 2026. The application, filed by Roger Duncan and Trevor McIntosh, sought to postpone the Extraordinary General Congress and suspend the GFA Council elections pending the determination of the substantive claim before the Court.
Team Duncan claimed multiple inconsistencies and procedural irregularities which resulted in the disqualification of their slate, effectively denying them a fair opportunity to contest the 9 May elections.
In her ruling, Justice Bailey acknowledged that the concerns brought forward by Team Duncan were neither frivolous nor entirely unsustainable and noted that the claim raised important questions surrounding fairness, natural justice, and the administration of the electoral process.
However, the Court ultimately determined that the balance of convenience weighed against granting the injunction.
Among the factors considered by the Court were:
- The advanced stage of the electoral process
- The potential disruption to football administration in Grenada;
- Evidence presented regarding possible adverse consequences within FIFA’s regulatory framework if the elections were interrupted by Court order;
- The availability of internal appeal mechanisms within the GFA structure; and
- The timing of the application, which was filed only days before the scheduled elections.
As it relates to point 3, the evidence mentioned was a letter purportedly emanating from FIFA which stated that the governing body would consider suspension of the GFA if the injunction was successful. This letter weighed heavily in the judge’s decision.
The Court also noted evidence presented by the GFA indicating that Team Duncan had begun preparations and campaign activities well before the formal electoral timetable was announced and that several clubs were able to comply with the endorsement requirements within the stipulated period.
Justice Bailey emphasised that the Court’s refusal to grant interim relief does not amount to a final determination of the substantive matters raised in the claim. The Court made no final findings regarding allegations of negligence, breaches of natural justice, standing, or the broader fairness of the electoral process. Those issues remain open for determination at trial.
The application for interim injunctive relief was therefore dismissed, and the Court ordered that costs be paid by the Applicants to the Respondent, to be assessed if not agreed.
Team Duncan respects the decision of the Court and thanks its legal team, who stood in support of the principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability throughout this process.
While disappointed with the outcome of the application, Team Duncan remains steadfast in its commitment to the development of football in Grenada and to advocating for strong governance, integrity, and inclusiveness within the sport.
Team Duncan
