by Perry C Douglas
for Inclusive Economies…The Application of Technology as an Agent of Social Change
In Trinidad and Tobago, the sudden termination of the Government’s $71.7 million project between China Gezhouba Group International Engineering Company and the Housing Development Corporation (HDC) in 2019 has drawn attention to a lack of transparency in the awarding of the contract, and what has been described as overly generous concessions to this Chinese company.
In Suriname, there are increasingly alarming rising fears that mounting debt to China, spanning decades, can have the impact of stalling future development and exposing the country to liabilities way above its ability to pay.
In short, China lends desperately poor countries billions for investment, knowing very well that those investments are incapable of producing enough output or return, enough to service the huge debt load taken on. Deals often have predatory type terms and conditions attached for non-performance. Allowing China contractually, to seize vital public infrastructure assets as collateral if those set terms are not upheld, i.e. neocolonialism at its most elegant form.
Economics has never been a morality play; so, it’s not China’s responsibility to look after the interest of our people, it is the responsibility of leaders, in consultation with the people, to lead and look after the interest of their nations. We must be committed to real change, otherwise, nothing will ever change! The highly skilled Chinese negotiators need to be matched with our powerful team of negotiators, weaponized with the tools and resources of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning algorithms, and systems that can process and provide actionable solutions at a simple keystroke.
China’s engagement in the region does not necessarily have to be negative, it could be a big positive for growth. Notwithstanding, it will all depend on how we play our cards—understand the historical colonialism playbook of others and develop counter offences…be proactive, not reactive, and control the narrative. There must be a better more equitable vision for a mutually beneficial operating model, for the management of the relationship with China. This operating ecosystem must be formattable, backed up by strong executable mechanisms, progressive regulatory environments, compliance, and governance, abiding by sturdy democratic principles…the rule of law, freedom of information, and enhanced transparency, in the context of an anti-corruption agenda.
Assets belonging to the people becoming collateralized property in business deals is beyond the pale, way beyond the bounds of any acceptable actions and behaviour by any government, and it is fundamentally illegal. Sovereignty represents a state’s most precious right and freedom under international law.
Project in Guyana signed on January 9, 2017; in Article 8.1:
“The borrower hereby irrevocably waives any immunity on the grounds of sovereignty or otherwise for itself or its property in connection with any arbitration proceeding…or with the enforcement of any arbitral award pursuant thereto.”
“This is Guyana dangerously agreeing to cede sovereignty. It plays into the Chinese strategy of using economic weaponry in the pursuit of influence and domination,” says attorney and chartered accountant Christopher Ram. In short, these governments have signed away their nation’s sovereignty, dignity, and basic self-respect, to China. China could simply walk in and take control of Guyana’s assets through its preset “debt trap.”
Very recently, July 2020, a Kenyan Appellate Court halted a construction deal, by pronouncing the $3.2 billion contract between Kenya and China for the construction of the Standard Gauge Railways (SGR,) as illegal. The recent judgment effectively lifted the lid on the “dragon’s debt-trap diplomacy.” China had been pressuring Kenya to pay the huge debt, while in the middle of battling a pandemic.
Since 2013, Kenya has saddled itself with more than $5 billion in loans from China for construction on the project. However, in just its first year of operation, the project reported losses of about $98 million US, making servicing the debt impossible. And of course, the terms of the deal made it such, that if Kenya couldn’t repay, it could end up giving China control over some of its most important assets. In this case, it would have been Mombasa Port, Kenya’s largest and most valuable port in east Africa, the gateway into Kenya and landlocked neighbouring nations Burundi, Congo, Rwanda, South Sudan, and Uganda. “Therefore, losing control over the port would mean erosion of Kenya’s sovereignty.” The implications are freighting, thousands of port workers would be forced to work under its Chinese lenders—colonialism would have crept back. Fortunately, Kenya’s court system saved the day, bringing a wake-up call to all those involved in similar entanglements with China. We hope Caribbean leadership took the call!
Covid-19 has provided us with a pause, an inflection point, to shift our thinking and strategy focus towards a better future, we can’t get stuck in the past, behind amateurish politicians, with nothing but stale ideas that have never worked out for the people. If we stand still, we perish; we must move in the same direction the world is moving in or be left behind!
Like Africa, the Caribbean desperately needs foreign direct investment to develop its economy, even more so with the global economy transitioning into the digital age. However, the specifics of every deal and financial structure must be transparent to the public. Furthermore, the base economics supporting the investment must be presented ahead of time, including performance-based metrics, data sources supporting the investment case, data-driven analysis, and specific analysis and modelling, including advance predictive modelling and decision-making algorithms. Most importantly, deals must be inclusive to the broader population of the Caribbean, demonstrating first, the intrinsic net benefit to the region.
In short, greater investment focus on digital commerce needs to be applied, become the priority. It is counter-intuitive to build backward and in line with China’s geopolitical and economic objectives when the rest of the world is moving in another direction.
Domestic success depends on global commerce, but for over 400 years we’ve been on the wrong side of that curve. Digital transformation underpins a prosperity reality and must be the government’s top policy development priority. Resources need to be mobilized with the stated objective being to leapfrog the regional economy into the more prosperous global economy, our ambitions have to be focused, and big! We can’t just sit there, letting others decide our future for us.
We must invest to diversify the entire region to protect our society from future global shocks, as witnessed by the pandemic, which has essentially wiped out the tourism economy. We need diversification and foresight.
If we had a vibrant commerce based agricultural and fisheries industry, for example, with robust global digital sales and marketing capabilities, we would be able to achieve food security and effectively export meaningfully for-profit simultaneously. Pandemic or no pandemic!
A diversified economy is a resilient economy.
A fundamental change in approach and the underlying variables is relative to how development should logically be carried out—a fundamental change in basic thinking, concepts, and practices, highly relevant to the digital era in which we live in, is paramount! The Caribbean needs a new common Investment Policy Statement, a new operating paradigm, one that is progressive, inclusive, with empathy towards sustainable socioeconomic development. Politicians should no longer be put in charge of investment decisions, instead, a professional data and applied intelligence-driven performance approach must be taken up immediately! Scientific ecosystems coupled with highly qualified investment committees, responsible to the people, is the push! Driven by intelligent scientific data-based decisioning and predictable modelling, powered by Artificial Intelligence, followed up with fearless implementation and actions, transparent and measurable—is the push! This new paradigm includes an advanced level of due diligence, governance, and transparency, all of which must be brought to the investment decisioning forefront, in examining the probability of desired outcomes in future ‘worlds’ scenarios.
Throughout history, technology-driven economic investment and infrastructure development have driven civilizations to prosperity, always! History shows, through evidence and analysis, that those nations that have deliberately focused on facilitating technology-led growth, went on to forge empires. Today, the world is at another transitioning inflection point, and good decisions taken here can change the directional curvature of prosperity for the entire Caribbean. History shows, like other periods of great technological transition opportunities before it, mishandling it at this critical juncture, will set the entire region back behind the prosperity curve, for generations to come!
The genesis of our future prosperity begins with how we first choose to think! Instinctive and emotional thinking must be put aside for a more slow, deliberative, and logical process—with an entrepreneurial mindset being at the forefront. Increased efficiencies and productivity will increase a nation’s profits and inter-generational wealth curve trajectory, upwards. Growing the standard of living through the development of a highly-skilled, tech-savvy middle-class, throughout the region. This is our best and most optimal opportunity; lets push!
Socioeconomic also history tells us that we must resist the intuitive nature of our human condition, towards decision-making processes and choices. Think and focus logically instead, find the data-driven solutions, and put emotions and ego aside. Playing the long game is critical to future success. Decisions based on intelligence gathering and actions are central to good outcomes. Such focused thinking is paramount and can be the genesis of a true Caribbean Renaissance.
nah we need china. if we cant develop this country ourselves no one will. i am glad for the peoples republic of china because they built both the athletic and cricket stadium along with housing projects and more. Grenadians are too sensitive when it comes to topics about relations of china thanks to the Rumors and lies being created in the last 10 years. Rwanda is a very successful country and they had alot of involvement with the chinese. If we have involvement with them too we will become and successful country. it only takes a helping hand for development. As you can see today the government has announced its first ever Loan from china. So I don’t know whats all the fuss and commotion about. Is it because of our dumb african and jamaican friends that have been putting lies into our head. GRENADA IS DOING GREAT AND WILL BE DOING BETTER WITH CHINA. be grateful for what you have. Some of you hypocrates talking about china and government are the same ones going to the chinese built stadium. We need china and they are doing great. THERE IS NO SUCH THING SUCH AS DEVELOPMENT IN GRENADA WITHOUT FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT BECAUSE WE ARE TOO LAZY AND NOT HARD WORKING.
I “love” this article: a lot of facts and a lot of talk talk talk. So why is this NOT going to work? Its simple: no one is listening – and even if they were they are not seriously going to do anything about it, are they? Please. We know this.
As the old people: you make the bed, now lie in it!
Many strong opinions here. I think this is a very important and good debate that it is important to get involved in. I myself come from a small area in Norway that has focused on energy production. In order to support the region in order to maintain its position as a leading supplier of energy, technology development was absolutely crucial. Especially with a view to the transition from oil & gas to alternative energy sources. In the process, it was crucial to attract leading competence and schooling in the region. How to attract this expertise? Facilitate studies, be attractive to these people so that they will choose us over others. Should not be any problem for beautiful Grenada.
As mentioned earlier in the article, one must do in-depth studies on which areas can be sustainable investments for our region. For example, the world’s energy needs in the decades to come with an expected increase in growth. See figures from Opec analysis:
What can Grenada contribute here?
Grenada has facilitated school for many up-and-coming students who come from all over the world. How far have these environments on Grenada come with studies on solar, wind, wave power and Hydrogen Technology? The country’s location at least has plenty of weather so this should be convenient.
Once you have established an environment, it is so much easier to build on. This costs a bit in a start-up phase but will draw bills of exchange on this in the future and this will of course create jobs and international focus on a positive thing that Grenada’s residents own themselves.
China working on owning Grenada, I mean Chinada. Little by little, slowly but non-stop they continue on their plan as they are doing all over the Caribbean. One day people will ask “how did this happen?” the answer is simply to look at the government, the ones signing papers with China.
I don’t know where Perry Douglas went to school, or if he ever took a decent course in finance (or any ither business discipline), but the readers of this newspaper should understand that it is impossible to make an objective science out of the problem of evaluating an investment project in a developing country like Grenada.
Nobody knows what will happen in the future except God, if He exists. All of the future costs and benefits of an investment project cannot be known with certainty in advance. These costs and benefits can only be estimated, and the estimates are always wrong. The only question is, by how much.
There are no algorithms that can tell you, at a keystroke, whether a complex development project will succeed or not. There are so many unknowns and so many intangibles that the decision on whether to proceed will always involve a large dose of professional judgment, and so will always ultimately need to be in the hands of politicians, not “investment committees” of technocrats.
I agree with the basic argument of this article — that the Grenada Government should not take on too much Chinese debt and should be transparent about the deals it makes with Chinese companies. But when has the political culture in Grenada ever allowed or achieved meaningful transparency? Maurice Bishop and Bernard Coard were as secretive as Eric Gairy and Keith Mitchell.
So look in the mirror, Grenadians. You have to improve before your leaders can “give” you good government.
Chad Chen! Your level of education seems to be very low. From which country is your degree from?
Chad, Native Grenadians are supported by what it referred to as “victim guaranteed qualifications”; consequently, it matters not where Perry went to school.
It seems as though if native Grenadians sit back and let China pull the entire rug from under our feet, you will be extremely happy and excited.
Nothing that China does in Grenada is to benefit Native Grenadians so let us face the truth and deal with it right not.
WOW, what a bunch of fancy words. PM Thomas was also supportive of an agro economy and got voted out after one term. Here was grand talk of prosperity and a rising standard of living. Let me say tht I think the most valuable commodity is time and the one thing that steals your time fastest is debt. Who’s got the best standard of living, the guy with the fancy car chasing every dollar to pay for it or the guy taking the bus to the beach to lime with his best friends? When Ivan took the nutmeg we shifted to tourism, then to CBI and now with the Covid we need to shift again back to the land. Grenadians were better off before Iphones and MTV and BETV, when the insane US culture wasn’t turning our youth into lazy gangstas. Two things, there are 7.5 billion people on a planet that can support 3 billion and China didn’t become what it is until after the one child policy had effect. It has been said that Grenadas most valuable export is her children, well, it may have been, BUT, it isn’t any more, nobody wants them or needs them so get over it. It IS time to find a new way and there’s nothing wrong with tech and AI and a good education BUT when too many people are chasing the same buck those people have less value and that’s where we are today. I’ll bet you 90% of the human race has less intrinsic value today than it did 40 or 50 years ago so, if you want a better life and a higher standard of living follow the successful model of China, stop making babies!