by Kari Grenade, PhD, Caribbean Economist and Macroeconomic Advisor
In July 2022, a high-level meeting was convened in Bridgetown Barbados, in which Prime Minister Honourable Mia Mottley proposed a series of bold initiatives aimed at up-scaling international climate finance and making access easier for countries, such as those in the Caribbean that are most vulnerable to climate change to better enable them to respond to climate challenges.
Barbados’ proposals have since been dubbed the Bridgetown Initiative.
In summary, the Bridgetown Initiative sets out 3 specific and, in my view, common-sense proposals to make international climate finance work better, especially for countries that are on the frontlines of the climate battle. The first proposal is the introduction of natural disaster clauses in long-term loans to enable countries to temporarily halt the repayments of their debt in the event of natural calamities. The aim of this proposal is twofold: one, to free up resources during a natural crisis to enable countries to cushion the impact on their peoples; and two, to prevent countries that are already highly indebted and vulnerable, such as those in the Caribbean, from descending into a debt crisis when faced with a pandemic or successive natural hazards that typically turn into natural disasters. The second proposal is for an up-sizing of concessional financing from multilateral development banks such as the World Bank by an additional US$1 trillion to developing countries, specifically for building climate resilience. The third proposal is for the establishment of a new financial mechanism with backing from the global private sector to fund climate mitigation and reconstruction after a climate event.
The proposals set out in the Bridgetown Initiative are not ordinary ones; indeed, they can ill afford to be ordinary because our extraordinary climate challenges demand extraordinary solutions. At the high-level meeting in Bridgetown last July, Prime Minister Mottley expressed with great moral clarity that, “If countries cannot access the finance they need at rates they can afford, the world will lose the battle, not simply the countries. What is good for the North is good for the South, East and West! This is the best development strategy for the people of the developing world. This is the best development strategy for the planet.”
For sure, the global financial system needs urgent and fundamental reforms to be relevant for the times. The deliberations at the high-level meeting in Bridgetown last July highlighted that climate-vulnerable countries face heavy debt burdens and high borrowing costs (much higher than what rich countries face) but have limited access to financing, which restricts their ability to adequately tackle the climate crisis through necessary mitigation and adaptation actions. Indeed, the proposals of the Bridgetown Initiative are intended to upend the extant status quo and usher in a new global financial system that is relevant for the times.
Since the launch of the Bridgetown Initiative in July 2022, there have been some noteworthy accomplishments such as the agreement at COP27 last December to establish a loss and damage fund, for which modalities are to be agreed at COP28 later this year. Additionally, a summit for a new global financing pact, jointly organised by the Governments of Barbados and France was held in Paris on 22-23 June 2023, which bought together several global leaders (many from the Global South) to discuss reforms that are needed to the global financial system, against the backdrop of the proposals of the Bridgetown Initiative. Based on international media reports, the summit was a success in that it was results-oriented; it delivered a roadmap requiring specific actions by specific dates. Furthermore, on 22 June, the World Bank announced a comprehensive toolkit to support countries after natural disasters. The toolkit includes, among other significant components, a pause in debt repayments after a natural disaster so that countries can focus on taking care of their peoples, while debt repayments are suspended temporarily.
Caribbean citizens should be tremendously proud of the Bridgetown Initiative. The proposals are not theoretical or abstract, but pragmatic and respond in a real and meaningful way to the climate challenges faced by women, men, children, and animals in communities across the Caribbean. Indeed, the implications for day-to-day life and living in the Caribbean are immense. More concessional financing to climate-vulnerable countries such as those in the Caribbean is imperative for Caribbean governments to fund the cost of mitigation and adaptation and in turn, help communities and citizens build resilience to climate change. In practical terms, more concessional climate financing (loans and grants) is needed to build stronger houses, schools, hospitals, bridges, roads, sea defences, more solar farms, and climate-smart agriculture systems to promote greater food and nutrition security, and to fund more public awareness campaigns to increase the consciousness of Caribbean citizens towards climate-smart and nature-positive practices in all sectors and spheres of life and living.
If massive amounts of concessional climate financing are not made easily accessible to the Caribbean, in years to come, where we live may determine if we live.
I am yet to see how you intend to use your training and come with your own ideas, instead of regurgitating the work of others.
Excellent article, Kari