In recent times, a concerning trend has been observed within the government’s contract awarding system.
Several insiders of the NDC have been recipients of lucrative government contracts spanning various ministries. The New National Party (NNP), ever committed to the principles of transparency and meritocracy, cannot overlook this pattern and the questions it raises about the government’s priorities.
Awarding contracts based on merit and qualifications ensures that services are rendered efficiently and effectively. It’s a principle that any democratic government should uphold as it reflects a commitment to fairness and to getting the best value for taxpayer money. However, when a disproportionate number of contracts appear to be funnelled towards individuals affiliated with a particular political faction, it raises eyebrows and valid concerns.
The heart of the matter isn’t just about who gets which contract. It’s about the broader implications for Grenada’s vulnerable populations. As we’re seeing a trend in contract awards, we’re simultaneously witnessing significant cuts to essential social programmes. The SEED Programme, a lifeline for many, has seen reductions in its stipends. De-bushing contracts, crucial for maintaining our landscapes and providing employment, have dwindled, and most recently the sale of the low-income houses intended for the poorest amongst us. These aren’t isolated incidents but seem to be part of a larger shift where programmes designed to uplift and support the most vulnerable among us are being scaled back.
While the government’s fiscal responsibilities are understood and respected, the juxtaposition of trimming essential services and the apparent prioritisation of party insiders for contracts is unsettling. Such actions not only undermine public trust but also jeopardise the well-being of many Grenadians.
The NNP firmly believes that the government’s primary duty is to its citizens, especially those who rely heavily on its support. Awarding contracts to the most qualified candidates, irrespective of political affiliation, ensures not only the best outcomes for projects but also reinforces public trust in the system.
We call on the Grenada government to reevaluate its current trajectory. Prioritising the needs of its citizens, especially the less fortunate, isn’t merely a duty inscribed in governance principles; it’s the moral and right course of action. As Grenada moves forward, let it be with the assurance that every citizen, regardless of their economic or political standing, is valued and prioritised.
NNP
Grenada needs a third viable political party, to end this chronic political divide. This tith for tath policies stagnating our capacity to move forward. When will it stop?
I cannot believe the audacity of the NNP, speaking about awarding contracts to the most qualified when they are now in opposition.
What happened during the Covid period when contracts were dished out to suporters and party activist. Was the suitably qualified taken into account then?
NNP just wants to be relevant. Who could have dictated to them what to do and how to do it. That’s what they do when in opposition cry about everything. When they use to give only their supporters everything. It’s a shame they are crying out now.